Devices, systems, and methods for processing heterogeneous materials

ABSTRACT

A system for processing a heterogeneous material includes a conduit for a pressurized fluid and a nozzle assembly in fluid communication with the conduit. The nozzle assembly includes a plurality of adjustable nozzles configured such that streams of heterogeneous material passing through each nozzle intersect after passing through the adjustable nozzles. Another system includes a conduit for a pressurized fluid, a nozzle assembly, and a separation system configured to separate particles of a heterogeneous material into a first fraction and a second fraction. The nozzle assembly includes an adjustable nozzle configured such that a stream of the heterogeneous material passing through the nozzle contacts a surface after passing through the nozzle. A method of processing a heterogeneous material includes entraining heterogeneous particles into a fluid stream, passing the fluid stream through at least one adjustable nozzle, impacting the fluid stream to ablate the heterogeneous particles, and classifying the heterogeneous particles.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication Ser. No. 61/535,253, filed Sep. 15, 2011, and entitled“Devices, Systems, and Methods for Processing Heterogeneous Materials”and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/593,741, filed Feb.1, 2012, and entitled “Methods for Processing Heterogeneous Materials”the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein in theirentireties by this reference.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to processing heterogeneousmaterials, such as ores or oil-contaminated sands, to separate thematerials into discrete components.

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous materials, such as heterogeneous solid materials, occurnaturally and may also be formed by man-made processes. For example,naturally occurring ores may include volumes containing a material ofinterest (i.e., a so-called “bearing fraction”), such as a metal or amineral, mixed with volumes not containing the material of interest(i.e., a so-called “non-bearing fraction”). Recovery of the material ofinterest generally requires physical or chemical separation of thebearing fraction from the non-bearing fraction. Chemical separation mayrequire reagents (e.g., cyanide, acids, carbonates), which may beexpensive or raise environmental challenges.

As one example of a heterogeneous material, uranium is typically foundin nature as uranium ore. Low-grade uranium ore may contain any form ofuranium-containing compounds in concentrations up to about 5 lbs of U₃O₈equivalent per ton of ore (about 2.5 kg of U₃O₈ equivalent per 1000 kgof ore, or about 0.25% uranium oxides by weight), whereas higher gradeore may contain uranium-containing compounds in concentrations of about8 lbs of U₃O₈ equivalent per ton of ore (about 4.0 kg of U₃O₈ equivalentper 1000 kg of ore, or about 0.4% uranium oxides by weight), about 30lbs of U₃O₈ equivalent per ton of ore (about 15 kg of U₃O₈ equivalentper 1000 kg of ore, or about 1.5% uranium oxides by weight) or more.

Uranium deposits may be formed in sandstone by erosion and redeposition.For example, an uplift may raise a uranium-bearing source rock andexpose the source rock to the atmosphere. The source rock may thenerode, forming solutions of uranium and secondary minerals. Thesolutions may migrate along the surface of the earth or throughpermeable subsurface channels into a sandstone formation, stopping at astructural or chemical boundary. Uranium minerals may then be depositedas a patina or coating around or between grains of the formation.Uranium may also be present in carbonaceous materials within sandstone.Uranium may be all or a portion of the cementing material between grainsof the formation.

FIG. 1 shows a section photomicrograph of sandstone formations from theShirley Basin in Central Wyoming. As shown in FIG. 1, uranium-bearingsandstone 10 may include various constituents. In general, oversizematerial 12 may be defined as relatively large particles or fragments,such as homogeneous particles of host rock. Oversize material 12 mayalso be defined as particles larger than can be processed in aparticular processing system. For example, in some sandstone 10,oversize material 12 may include cobbles and stones arbitrarily definedas material having an average diameter larger than about 0.25 inches(in.) (6.35 mm). Oversize materials 12 in sandstone 10 generally do notcontain much uranium. Grains 14 may generally be defined as particles orfragments smaller than oversize material 12. Grains 14 may includeparticles having diameters from about 400-mesh (i.e., about 0.0015 in.or about 0.037 mm) to about 0.25 in. (6.35 mm), and may include quartzor feldspar. Grains 14 in sandstone 10 do not typically contain muchuranium, but uranium may be formed around the grains 14 due todeposition. Fines may be generally defined as particles disposed amongthe oversize material 12 and the grains 14, and may include materialsalso found in the grains 14 and oversized material 12, such as uranium,quartz, feldspar, etc. Fines may cement the oversize material 12 and thegrains 14 into a solid mass. Fines in uranium-bearing sandstone 10(e.g., particles smaller than about 400-mesh) may include light fines 16and heavy fines 18. Light fines 16 generally have a specific gravity upto about 4.0 with reference to water, whereas heavy fines 18 have aspecific gravity greater than about 4.0. Uranium compounds are generallycomponents of the heavy fines 18, but may also be a part of light fines16 in the form of deposits on carbonaceous materials. For example,uraninite has a specific gravity from about 6.5 to about 10.95,depending on its degree of oxidation, and coffinite has a specificgravity of about 5.4. Both light fines 16 and heavy fines 18 may bebound to grains 14 in the sandstone 10. In the sandstone 10, theoversize material 12, grains 14, light fines 16, and heavy fines 18 maybe combined into a single mass.

Uranium may conventionally be recovered through in-situ recovery (ISR),also known in the art as in-situ leaching (ISL) or solution mining. InISR, a leachate or lixiviant solution is pumped into an ore formationthrough a well. The solution permeates the formation and dissolves aportion of the ore. The solution is extracted through another well andprocessed to recover the uranium. Reagents used to dissolve uranium ofthe ore may include an acid or carbonate. ISR may have variousenvironmental and operational concerns, such as mobilization of uraniumor heavy metals into aquifers, footprint of surface operations,interconnection of wells, etc. ISR typically requires particularreagents, which must be supplied, recovered, and treated. Because ISRrelies on the subsurface transport of a solution, ISR cannot generallybe used in formations that are impermeable or shallow.

Uranium may also conventionally be mined in underground mines or surfacemines (e.g., strip mines, open-pit mines, etc.). During such miningactivities, it may be necessary to process large quantities of materialhaving a concentration of uranium too low for economic recovery byconventional processes. Such material (e.g., overburden) may be treatedas waste or as a material for use in mine reclamation. Conventionalmining may produce significant amounts of such low-concentrationmaterial, which may require treatment during or subsequent to miningoperations. It would therefore be advantageous to provide a method ofuranium recovery that minimizes or alleviates these concerns.

SUMMARY

In some embodiments, a system for processing a heterogeneous materialincludes a conduit for a pressurized fluid and a nozzle assembly influid communication with the conduit. The nozzle assembly includes aplurality of adjustable nozzles configured such that streams comprisinga heterogeneous material passing through each of the plurality ofadjustable nozzles intersect after passing through the plurality ofadjustable nozzles.

In other embodiments, a system includes a conduit for a pressurizedfluid, a nozzle assembly in fluid communication with the conduit, and aseparation system configured to separate particles of a heterogeneousmaterial into a first fraction and a second fraction. The nozzleassembly includes an adjustable nozzle configured such that a stream ofthe heterogeneous material passing through the adjustable nozzlecontacts a surface approximately perpendicular to the surface afterpassing through the nozzle. The particles of the first fraction have afirst average property, and the particles of the second fraction have asecond average property different from the first average property.

In certain embodiments, a method of processing a heterogeneous materialincludes entraining heterogeneous particles of a material into a fluidstream, passing the fluid stream through at least one adjustable nozzle,impacting the fluid stream to ablate the heterogeneous particles of thematerial, and classifying the heterogeneous particles.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing outand distinctly claiming what are regarded as embodiments of the presentdisclosure, various features and advantages of embodiments of thepresent disclosure may be more readily ascertained from the followingdescription of some embodiments of the present disclosure when read inconjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph of uranium ore in a sandstone formation;

FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph of a carbonaceous material;

FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic illustrating an embodiment of a systemfor processing a heterogeneous material;

FIG. 4 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a nozzle assembly as shownin the system of FIG. 3;

FIGS. 5 and 6 are enlarged cross-sectional views of nozzle assemblies ofadditional embodiments of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 is a simplified schematic illustrating a portion of the systemshown in FIG. 3;

FIG. 8 is a simplified view of an embodiment of an elutriator;

FIG. 9 is a simplified cross-sectional view of the elutriator of FIG. 8;

FIG. 10 is a simplified view of a cylindrical stage of the elutriator ofFIG. 8;

FIG. 11 is a simplified cross-sectional view of the cylindrical stage ofFIG. 10;

FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the calculated terminal velocity ofselected particles in an elutriator according to an embodiment of thepresent disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a side view of an embodiment of a system for processing aheterogeneous material;

FIG. 14 is a simplified schematic illustrating another embodiment of asystem for processing a heterogeneous material;

FIGS. 15 through 17 are photomicrographs of ore samples fromsandstone-hosted uranium deposits;

FIG. 18 is a graph illustrating a particle size distribution for acrushed sample of ore from sandstone-hosted uranium deposits;

FIG. 19 is a graph illustrating a particle size distribution and apercentage of uranium in each size fraction for a crushed sample of orefrom sandstone-hosted uranium deposits;

FIG. 20 is a graph illustrating a particle size distribution and apercentage of uranium in each size fraction for a crushed sample of orefrom sandstone-hosted uranium deposits and for a sample of the samematerial after ablation;

FIGS. 21 and 22 are graphs illustrating concentrations of elements as afunction of ablation time in water used in an ablation process accordingto an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 23 is a photomicrograph of a crushed ore sample fromsandstone-hosted uranium deposits, including a mineral patina; and

FIG. 24 is a photomicrograph of an ablated crushed ore sample fromsandstone-hosted uranium deposits.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Devices, systems and methods for processing heterogeneous materials,such as heterogeneous solids, are described. In one embodiment, a methodincludes entraining heterogeneous particles into a fluid stream. Thefluid stream is passed through at least one nozzle of a system, and isimpacted to ablate the heterogeneous particles via kinetic collisionsbetween particles within the fluid stream. As used herein, the term“ablate” means and includes wearing away by flexure, rebound, anddistortion. Ablation may also include wear by friction, chipping,spalling, or another erosive process. When particles are ablated, theboundary between different materials may become more highly stressedthan the bulk materials themselves. Thus, ablation may be particularlyapplicable to physical removal of coatings from an underlying material.Ablation imparts energy to the material being ablated to physicallydissociate the material into various fractions (e.g., a solid fractionand an oil or two solid fractions). The ablated particles may then beclassified to divide the heterogeneous material into various fractions.Ablation and separation may significantly reduce the amount of materialto be further processed to recover the one or more desired components ofthe material. A system for the ablation process may include a conduitfor a pressurized fluid and a nozzle assembly. The nozzle assembly mayinclude two or more adjustable nozzles configured such that a streampassing through a nozzle intersects another stream passing throughanother nozzle in the nozzle assembly. The method and system may bescalable for operations of any size. The system may be portable, and itsuse may make separation commercially feasible in instances whereinconventional separation processes are impractical.

The devices, systems, and methods described herein may be particularlyapplicable to ores, such as sandstone, for the recovery of selectedminerals, such as uranium-containing compounds. Uranium is often apost-depositional material, carried into an already establishedsandstone formation by mineral-bearing solutions. Without being bound toany particular theory, it is believed that when these mineral-bearingsolutions reached a reduction zone, carbon caused the uranium to reduceand precipitate out of solution to faun stable uranium-containingcompounds. Because the sandstone formation was already in place, theseuranium-containing compounds formed in two very specific locationswithin the ore—as a mineral patina surrounding grains and incarbonaceous material. Because the grain structure of sandstone isrelatively impermeable, uranium patinas do not penetrate the grains.Instead, uranium patinas form a boundary between the grain and thecementing material in the sandstone formation.

As shown in FIG. 1, the uranium mineral patina includes the heavy fines18, and is shown around quartz grains 14. Carbonaceous materials arecommonly found in sandstone-hosted uranium deposits, such as in thelight fines 16 shown in FIG. 1. In sandstone-hosted uranium deposits,carbonaceous materials generally range in size from less than about 1 mmto more than about 25 mm across. Other carbonaceous materials includepartially decomposed trees, coal seams, etc., and vary widely in size.FIG. 2 shows a sample of a carbonaceous material. Carbonaceous materialsgenerally have low specific gravities of between about 1.25 and 1.30,and may contain high concentrations of uranium or otherpost-depositional elements deposited by permeation of mineral-bearingsolutions. However, carbonaceous materials may also have specificgravities higher or lower, depending on how the carbonaceous materialsformed. For example, some carbonaceous materials may have specificgravities less than about 1.0. Carbonaceous materials subjected tocompressive forces may have specific gravities greater than about 1.5.Dissociating and then recovering the light fines 16 from the oversizematerial 12, the grains 14, and the heavy fines 18 may therefore enableenhanced recovery of certain elements without processing the entire massof sandstone by conventional techniques.

The properties of both the heavy fines 18 (including the mineralizeduranium patina) and the light fines 16 (including the carbonaceousmaterials) makes them each amenable to dissociation and separation fromthe oversize material 12, which does not contain uranium, and grains 14of sandstone using an ablation process of the present disclosure. Duringablation, the heavy fines 18 are separated from the oversize material 12and grains 14. Without the structure of the oversize material 12 andgrains 14, the patina has limited structure and fauns the heavy fines18, which are smaller than about 400-mesh. That is, the patina formsweak bonds between particles such that ablation breaks the patinaparticles down into particles smaller than about 400-mesh.

Some illustrations presented herein are not actual views of a particularsystem or process, but are merely idealized representations employed todescribe embodiments of the present disclosure. Elements common betweenfigures may retain the same numerical designation.

A system 100 for processing a heterogeneous material 103 is shownschematically in FIG. 3. To simplify the figures and clarify the presentdisclosure, not every element or component of the system 100 is shown ordescribed herein. The system 100 may also include appropriate piping,connectors, sensors, controllers, etc. (not shown), as will beunderstood by those of ordinary skill in the art. The system 100 mayinclude a hopper 101 feeding a tank 102, and a pump 104 in fluidcommunication with the tank 102. The pump 104 may transport a mixedheterogeneous material 106 (which may include a mixture of theheterogeneous material 103 from the hopper 101 and an ablatedheterogeneous material 124 that is recycled through a portion of thesystem 100, as explained in more detail below) through a continuous-flowmixing device 108 and a splitter 110. The mixed heterogeneous material106 may then pass through a nozzle assembly 114, and multiple streams ofthe mixed heterogeneous material 106 may impact one another, ablatingsolid particles therein to form the ablated heterogeneous material 124.The ablated heterogeneous material 124 may, in some embodiments, berecycled through the system 100 by mixing the ablated heterogeneousmaterial 124 with the unablated heterogeneous material 103 in the tank102. A stream 136 may be drawn off through a pump 138 to a separationsystem 140, where it may be separated into two or more components. Forexample, in the system 100, the separation system 140 may separate thestream 136 into grains 150, light fines 152, and heavy fines 154. Thoughshown as a continuous-flow operation, the system 100 may also beconfigured to operate in batch mode, as will be understood by a personhaving ordinary skill in the art. Similarly, the system 100 may includemultiple pumps, mixing apparatuses, and/or nozzle assemblies operated inseries, such as with the stream 136 being directed through a secondnozzle assembly before entering the separation system 140. A system 100having multiple nozzle assemblies operating in series may be configuredsuch that each and every particle of the heterogeneous material 103necessarily passes through each nozzle assembly at least once. Inembodiments in which the system 100 includes multiple nozzle assembliesoperating in series, subsequent nozzle assemblies may operate withoutadditional hoppers 101 or separation systems 140.

In some embodiments, the heterogeneous material 103 may be placed intothe hopper 101. The heterogeneous material 103 may include solidparticles or a mixture of solid particles with a liquid. For example,the heterogeneous material 103 may include a portion of an orecontaining a metal (e.g., uranium, gold, copper, and/or a rare-earthelement) to be recovered. In some embodiments, the heterogeneousmaterial 103 may be oil-contaminated sand. The liquid may include water(e.g., groundwater, process water, culinary or municipal water,distilled water, deionized water, etc.), an acid, a base, an organicsolvent, a surfactant, a salt, or any combination thereof. The liquidmay include dissolved materials, such as a carbonate or oxygen. In someembodiments, the liquid may be substantially pure water, or waterremoved from a water source (e.g., an underground aquifer) withoutpurification and without added components. The composition of the liquidmay be selected to balance economic, environmental, and processingconcerns (e.g., mineral solubility or disposal). The liquid may beselected to comply with environmental regulations. In one embodiment,the liquid may be substantially free of a reagent (e.g., a leachate, anacid, an alkali, cyanide, lead nitrate, etc.) that is formulated tochemically react with the particles in the heterogeneous material 103.In some embodiments, the liquid may be omitted. The hopper 101 may beconfigured to feed the heterogeneous material 103 into the tank 102. Forexample, the hopper 101 may be placed at a higher elevation than thetank 102, such that the heterogeneous material 103 flows by gravity intothe tank 102. The hopper 101 may include a device to move theheterogeneous material 103 to the tank 102, such as an auger, tilttable, etc., which may communicate with or be controlled by a computer184, such as a programmable logic controller (PLC). The computer 184 maydetect operating conditions of the system 100 via one or more sensors(not shown) and adjust the flow of the heterogeneous material 103accordingly.

The tank 102 may have an inlet (not shown) configured to receive theheterogeneous material 103 from the hopper 101. The tank 102 may haveone or more angled baffles 105 configured to direct the flow of theheterogeneous material 103. In a continuous-flow system, theheterogeneous material 103 may mix with a mixed heterogeneous material106 already in the tank 102. The tank 102 may optionally have an inputport (not shown) to add liquid to the mixed heterogeneous material 106.The tank 102 may include a volume that narrows toward the ground, suchas a conical portion. The narrowed volume may direct solids of the mixedheterogeneous material 106 into an outlet at the bottom of the tank 102.

The pump 104 may be in fluid communication with the tank 102, and maydraw the mixed heterogeneous material 106 from the outlet of the tank102. The pump 104 may be a horizontal centrifugal pump, an axialcentrifugal pump, a vertical centrifugal pump, or any other pumpconfigured to pressurize and transport the mixed heterogeneous material106. The pump 104 may be selected such that solid particles of the mixedheterogeneous material 106 may pass through the pump 104 at anappropriate flow rate without damaging the pump 104. For example, thepump 104 may be selected to pump 30 gallons per minute (gpm) (1.9 litersper second (l/s) of a mixed heterogeneous material 106 containingparticles up to about 0.25 in. (6.35 mm) in diameter at a pressure of 32pounds per square inch (psi) (221 kilopascals (kPa)). For example, thepump 104 may be a 5-horsepower WARMAN® Series 1000 pump, available fromWeir Minerals, of Madison, Wis. The pump 104 may deliver any selectedpressure and flow rate, and may be selected by a person having ordinaryskill in the art based on the requirements for a particular application(e.g., a selected heterogeneous material 103 feedstock composition andflow rate). The pump 104 may communicate with or be controlled by thecomputer 184. The computer 184 may detect operating conditions of thesystem 100 (e.g., by sensors (not shown)) and adjust the operation ofthe pump 104. In some embodiments, the system 100 may include multiplepumps 104 (not shown in FIG. 3).

The pump 104 may pressurize and transport the mixed heterogeneousmaterial 106 through a continuous-flow mixing device 108, such as a pipehaving mixing vanes inside. The continuous-flow mixing device 108 maypromote a uniform distribution of the solid particles within the mixedheterogeneous material 106. For example, mixing vanes may cause largeror more dense particles (which may tend to be distributed differently inthe mixed heterogeneous material 106 than fines) to be remixedthroughout the mixed heterogeneous material 106. The mixed heterogeneousmaterial 106 may pass through a splitter 110, separating the mixedheterogeneous material 106 into a plurality of streams 112 approximatelyequal in volumetric flow and composition. For example, the splitter 110may produce two, three, four, or more streams 112. In some embodiments,a rotor of the pump 104 may be aligned with respect to the splitter 110such that each stream 112 includes identical or nearly identical amountsof solid particles of each size and/or density. For example, a plane ofsymmetry of the splitter 110 may be perpendicular to an axis of rotationof the rotor of the pump 104. In such embodiments, the continuous-flowmixing device 108 may be omitted, saving energy that would otherwise beused for mixing in the continuous-flow mixing device 108. In embodimentshaving multiple pumps 104 (not shown in FIG. 3), the mixed heterogeneousmaterial 106 may be separated into components without a continuous-flowmixing device 108.

The streams 112 produced by the splitter 110 or from the multiple pumps104 (not shown in FIG. 3) may enter a nozzle assembly 114, shown insimplified cross-sectional view in FIG. 4, through a plurality of inlets122. The nozzle assembly 114 may include a body 115 and a plurality ofnozzles 116 arranged and configured such that the streams 112 (notdepicted in FIG. 4) intersect in an impact zone 118, indicated by adashed circle in FIG. 4, after passing through the nozzles 116. Thestreams 112 may intersect in an open portion of the nozzle assembly 114.The nozzles 116 may form the streams 112 into coherent, focused streams.The nozzle assembly 114 may have a plurality of flow constriction zones120 between inlets 122 and the nozzles 116 in which the flow velocity ofthe streams 112 increases. The flow constriction zones 120 may havesizes and shapes such that the streams 112 flow through the nozzles 116without cavitation. The flow constriction zones 120 may have a size andshape configured to increase the flow velocity of the streams 112isentropically (i.e., with little or no increase in entropy), such as bya reversible adiabatic compression. The flow constriction zones 120 mayreduce the area through which the streams 112 pass. Each nozzle 116 mayhave a plurality of straight sections 121 having one or more wallsapproximately parallel to an axis of symmetry 117 between the flowconstriction zones 120 and the nozzle exits 119. The straight sections121 may serve to collimate or align the flow of particles and fluid ofthe streams 112 so that the particles travel in directions approximatelyparallel. Longer straight sections 121 may be more effective at aligningthe flow than shorter straight sections 121. In some embodiments, thecross-sectional area of the straight sections 121 may be approximatelythe same as the cross-sectional area of the nozzle exits 119, and may befrom about 5% to about 20% of the cross-sectional area of the inlets122. In other embodiments, the cross-sectional area of the nozzle exits119 may be approximately equal to the cross-sectional area of the inlets122, which may, in turn, be approximately equal to the cross section ofan outlet of the pump(s) 104. The diameter of the nozzle exits 119 maybe selected to be approximately twice the diameter of the largestparticles expected to pass through the nozzles 116. The velocity of thestreams 112 may vary in proportion to an inverse of the cross-sectionalarea, and the velocity of the streams 112 at the nozzle exits 119 maytherefore be from about 5 times to about 20 times the velocity ofstreams 112 at the inlets 122. The velocity of the streams 112 may betailored for a specific application. For example, the velocity of thestreams 112 may be from about 10 feet per second (ft/s) (3.0 meters persecond (m/s)) to about 1000 ft/s (305 m/s). The velocity of the streams112 may depend on the properties of the heterogeneous material 103 (FIG.3). For example, in some applications, the velocity of the streams 112may be from about 300 ft/s (91 m/s) to about 500 ft/s (152 m/s), whereasin other applications, the velocity of the streams 112 may be from about40 ft/s (12.2 m/s) to about 60 ft/s (18.3 m/s). The velocity of thestreams 112 may be selected such that solids are carried along withliquids in the heterogeneous material 106 and that enough energy istransferred to particles to dissociate constituents of the particleswithout breaking homogeneous portions of particles (e.g., to remove acoating without breaking a core over which a coating is disposed). Insome embodiments, the velocity of the streams may be selected (i.e.,relatively higher) such that enough energy is transferred to particlesto pulverize homogeneous portions of material into finer particles.Thus, the ablated heterogeneous material 124 (FIG. 3) may optionallyinclude particles having a relatively uniform particle size. Each of thenozzles 116 may have its own axis of symmetry 117 in the center thereof.The axis of symmetry 117 of one nozzle 116 may intersect or coincidewith the axis of symmetry 117 of another nozzle 116 in the impact zone118. In embodiments in which the nozzle assembly 114 contains twonozzles 116, the nozzles 116 may share a single axis of symmetry 117.Furthermore, the nozzles 116 may be oriented to face one another. Thatis, two streams 112 may impact one another traveling in oppositedirections (i.e., head-on) through counter-opposing nozzles 116. In suchan arrangement, the kinetic energy of the streams 112 converted toimpact energy may be larger than in nozzle arrangements in which thestreams impact obliquely or perpendicularly.

FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a nozzle assembly 114′. Asystem 100 having nozzle the assembly 114′ may not include a splitter110, but may instead be configured such that the entire mixedheterogeneous material 106 is directed through a single nozzle 116. Thenozzle 116 may be configured to direct the stream 112 (not depicted inFIG. 5) against a solid object, such as surface 123 of the impact zone118. The portion of the surface 123 against which the stream 112collides may be the impact zone 118 of the nozzle assembly 114′. In thenozzle assembly 114′ of FIG. 5, the body 115 and nozzle 116 may be asingle unitary structure.

FIG. 6 illustrates another embodiment of a nozzle assembly 114″. Eachstream 112 (not depicted in FIG. 6) may pass through multipleconstriction zones 120 separated by straight sections 121 before exitinga corresponding nozzle 116. Two constriction zones 120 are shown foreach nozzle 116 in the nozzle assembly 114″ shown in FIG. 6, but anozzle assembly 114″ may include any number of constriction zones 120.Multiple constriction zones 120 and multiple straight sections 121 maycontribute to increased collimation and decreased wear of the nozzleassembly 114″. Thus, additional constriction zones 120 may increase theefficiency of the system 100.

The impact zone 118 may be centrally positioned proximate to the nozzles116 (e.g., between or among multiple nozzles 116, or on a surface acrossa gap from a single nozzle 116). In embodiments having two nozzles 116,the impact zone 118 may be located midway between the two nozzles 116(i.e., if the streams 112 have equivalent mass flow and particledistribution), but may be located anywhere between the two nozzles 116or in any location in which the streams 112 can intersect. The size ofthe impact zone 118 may be determined by various design parameters, suchas the velocity of the mixed heterogeneous material 106, the size and/orshape of the nozzles 116, the roughness of the material of the nozzleassembly 114, the alignment of the nozzles 116, the number of nozzles116, the distance between the nozzles 116 (if applicable), the lengthand/or number of the straight sections 121, the composition of thestreams 112, etc. The impact zone 118 may encompass the vena contractaof each stream 112 (i.e., the point at which the diameter of each stream112 is at a minimum, and the velocity of each stream 112 is at amaximum). The volume or area of the impact zone 118 may correspond tothe concentration of energy of the streams 112. That is, in thecollision of tightly focused streams 112, particles may be more likelyto impact or collide directly with other particles traveling in anopposite direction than they are in streams 112 intersecting in a largervolume. The particles have a greater probability of colliding directlyif the streams 112 themselves impact directly. Likewise, in thecollision of a tightly focused stream with a surface 123, particles maybe more likely to collide with the surface 123 perpendicularly than theyare in a stream 112 tangentially intersecting a larger area of thesurface. To control the volume or area of the impact zone 118, it may bedesirable to limit or prevent flaring of the streams 112 as the streams112 leave the nozzles 116. Flaring may be reduced or eliminated by, forexample, lengthening the straight section 121, precision machining,reducing surface roughness, including a shielding fluid (e.g., air,water, oil, etc.) around the stream 112, etc.

The kinetic energy of the streams 112 may be used to separate materialsof the particles in the streams 112, such as coatings or layers ofmaterial overlying a core (e.g., a film, patina, varnish, oxide, orcrust). For example, if the mixed heterogeneous material 106 (andtherefore, each of the streams 112) contains uranium ore, includingparticles of the sandstone 10 shown in FIG. 1, the kinetic energy of thestreams 112 may remove the light fines 16 and/or the heavy fines 18 fromthe grains 14. If the mixed heterogeneous material 106 containsmicro-fine gold particles having silicate patinas, the kinetic energymay remove the silicate from the gold. If the mixed heterogeneousmaterial 106 contains oil-contaminated sand, the kinetic energy mayremove the oil coating from the grains of sand. Separation of materialsmay be a physical process (e.g., physical dissociation), independent ofany chemical process (e.g., chemical reaction, dissolution) of anymaterials. Thus, by utilizing embodiments of the present disclosure,materials may be separated without the addition of reagents (e.g.,leachates, acids, alkalis, cyanide, lead nitrate, etc.), and the system100 may be used to recover materials that are conventionally recoveredby environmentally or operationally problematic techniques. However, thereagents may be present in the liquid, such as in the groundwater, intrace amounts. Thus, embodiments of the present disclosure may be usedto separate materials from one another even when none of the materialshas sufficient solubility in the liquid for chemical separation.

The nozzle assembly 114 may be customized or tuned for variousapplications. For example, the distance from the nozzles 116 to theimpact zone 118 may be varied, such as by moving the nozzles 116 inwardor outward in the nozzle assembly 114. The nozzles 116 may beadjustable, including threaded fittings or other means to adjust theposition of the nozzles 116 with respect to the impact zone 118 (e.g.,to move the vena contracta within the impact zone 118). Other propertiesof the system 100 that may be adjusted include, for example, nozzlediameter, the number of nozzles, the length and/or number ofconstriction zones 120 and straight sections 121, the addition of aliquid to the mixed heterogeneous material 106, the maximum particlessize of the heterogeneous material 103 entering the system 100, etc.Performance may also be adjusted by changing the pressure and/orvelocity of the streams 112 exiting the nozzles 116. These propertiesmay be made by, for example, adjusting the power output of the pump 104.Such tuning may be desirable to use the system 100 to process differentmaterials. In some embodiments, tuning may be performed in the field,such that as changes are encountered in a feed stream of heterogeneousmaterial 103, adjustments may be made to maintain or improve processingefficiency.

In some embodiments, it may be desirable to impact particles with alower energy, such as when a bond between two materials to bedissociated is relatively low. The impact energy may be lowered byadjusting one or more properties as described above. The impact energymay also be lowered by colliding the streams 112 in a configurationother than directly opposing. Two streams 112 may be aligned such thatthey intersect at an angle less than 180°, such as in the shape of theletter “V.” Such an arrangement may also direct the flow of the materialafter impact.

After intersection of the streams 112 of the mixed heterogeneousmaterial 106 in the impact zone 118, the streams 112 may recombine intoa single stream of ablated heterogeneous material 124, and may flowthrough an outlet 126 of the nozzle assembly 114. The ablatedheterogeneous material 124 may contain more particles and/or finerparticles than the mixed heterogeneous material 106 entering the nozzleassembly 114. The outlet 126 may have a cross-sectional area larger thanthe combined cross-sectional areas of the nozzles 116, such that theflow of the ablated heterogeneous material 124 does not fill the entireoutlet 126. Air may, therefore, flow freely into or out of the outlet126 adjacent the impact zone 118. In some embodiments, the tank 102(FIG. 3) may be sealed from ambient air, and may be filled with a gas.For example, the tank 102 may contain an inert gas. In such embodiments,the inert gas may flow freely into or out of the outlet 126. The outlet126 may be disposed below the impact zone 118, such that the stream ofablated heterogeneous material 124 exits the nozzle assembly 114 by theforce of gravity. For example, if the nozzle assembly 114 has twonozzles 116, the nozzle assembly 114 may be shaped like the letter “T,”with the two nozzles 116 pointed at each other, and wherein the outlet126 is below the impact zone 118 between the nozzles 116. In embodimentsin which the streams 112 include a slurry, the nozzle assembly 114 mayhave air disposed therein, such that the streams 112 flow through airafter leaving the nozzles 116 and before reaching the impact zone 118.

Referring again to FIG. 3, the stream of ablated heterogeneous material124 may pass through the outlet 126 of the nozzle assembly 114 back tothe tank 102, and may mix with the mixed heterogeneous material 106 inthe tank 102. A discharge pump 138 may extract a stream 136 of the mixedheterogeneous material 106 from the tank 102 and may transfer the stream136 to a separation system 140. For example, the stream 136 may be drawnfrom an outlet located above one or more baffles 105, and theheterogeneous material 103 may enter the tank 102 below one or more ofthe baffles 105. The baffles 105 may direct the flow of the ablatedheterogeneous material 124 past the outlet for the stream 136 beforemixing the heterogeneous material 103 from the hopper 101, such thatmaterial of the stream 136 is drawn from the ablated heterogeneousmaterial 124 that has been passed through the nozzle assembly 114 atleast once. In some embodiments, and as discussed above, the system 100may include multiple nozzle assemblies 114 operated in series, such thatmaterial of the stream 136 passing to the separation system 140 haspassed through each nozzle assembly 114 at least once. In suchembodiments, the system 100 may include one or more transfer pumps totransfer material from one nozzle assembly 114 to another. The flow rateof the stream 136 may be varied relative to other flow rates (e.g., theflow rate of the heterogeneous material 103 into the tank 102 or theflow rate of the mixed heterogeneous material 106 through the pump 104)to adjust the average number of times that particles pass through thesystem 100. Different heterogeneous materials 103 may have differentbonding properties, and therefore may require different amounts ofenergy to effect dissociation. For example, relatively weaker bonds maybe broken by relatively less-direct collisions in the impact zone 118(see FIGS. 4 through 6), whereas relatively stronger bonds may requiremore-direct collisions. To increase the fraction of particles undergoingdirect collision, the particles may be recycled through the system 100(i.e., the flow of the mixed heterogeneous material 106 through the pump104 may be increased with respect to the flow of the stream 136 to theseparation system 140) and/or passed through more than one ablationsystem 100 in series.

In some embodiments, a separation system 140 may be designed to separateportions of the stream 136 by size, shape, density, magnetic character,electrostatic charge, or any other property of particles of the stream136. For example, in one embodiment and as shown in FIG. 7, theseparation system 140 may include a screen 142 (e.g., a rotary screen,an angled screen, etc.) to remove particles larger than a selected size.For example, the screen 142 may allow fines 148 (i.e., particles smallerthan the mesh size of the screen 142 (e.g., 140 wires per in. (55 wiresper cm))) to pass through the screen 142. Grains 150 (i.e., particleslarger than the mesh size of the screen 142) may be diverted elsewhere.The fines 148, the grains 150, or both, may be selected for furtherprocessing. For example, in a stream 136 containing gold particles, thegrains 150 may contain the gold, whereas the fines 148 may besubstantially free of gold. In such embodiments, the fines 148 may bediscarded or returned to the mine as barren waste (i.e., wastesubstantially free of a material of interest). In a stream 136containing uranium ore, the fines 148 may contain uranium, whereas thegrains 150 may contain barren ore. In such embodiments, the grains 150may be returned to a uranium mine as barren waste, and the fines 148 maybe further separated, such as in a gravimetric separator 144.

A portion of the stream 136 (e.g., the fines 148) may pass into agravimetric separator 144 for further separation. The particles of thestream 136 in the gravimetric separator 144 may have approximatelyuniform particle sizes, making them inseparable by screening, butseparable on the basis of density. For example, the gravimetricseparator 144 may be an elutriation system including a vertical column146. As used herein, the term “elutriation” means and includes a processof separating materials based on differences in density. The portion ofthe stream 136 to be separated (e.g., the fines 148) may enter the topof the vertical column 146. A fluid 156 (e.g., water) may be continuallyintroduced into the bottom of the vertical column 146 and may flowupward through the vertical column 146. The flow of fluid 156 throughthe vertical column 146 may be in either a laminar or a turbulentregime. It may be desirable to pass fluid 156 through the verticalcolumn 146 in the turbulent flow regime because surface roughness andflow perturbations may be inconsequential for turbulent flow, andcontrol may therefore be simpler. By regulating the rate at which fluid156 is introduced into the vertical column 146, it may be possible tocontrol the vertical flow rate within the vertical column 146 so thatlight fines 152 (particles having densities below a selected value) exitthe top of the vertical column 146 with the fluid 156, whereas heavyfines 154 (particles having densities above the selected value) sink tothe bottom of the vertical column 146. The heavy fines 154 may becontinuously extracted from the bottom of the vertical column 146, andthe volume of the fines removed may be replaced with makeup water addedat the bottom of the vertical column 146. Alternatively, the gravimetricseparator 144 may be operated in batch mode, and the heavy fines 154 maybe removed between operations.

The light fines 152 may be directed to another apparatus (e.g., ahydrocyclone, an evaporator, etc.) for separation of the fluid 156therefrom. In some embodiments, the gravimetric separator 144 mayinclude two or more vertical columns 146 in series, to enhanceseparation, or in parallel, to increase volumetric flow. Separation ofthe heavy fines 154 from the light fines 152 may decrease the amount ofmaterial to be processed to recover a target material of interest, andmay decrease the amount of the target material of interest left innon-bearing fractions. Fluids 156 used in the operation of the systemmay be cleaned by reverse osmosis, filtration, ion exchange, or anyother method known in the art.

In some embodiments, the gravimetric separator 144 depicted in FIG. 7may be an elutriator 200, as shown in FIGS. 8 through 11. A crosssection of the elutriator 200 is shown in FIG. 9. The elutriator 200includes a column 202 having a plurality of fluid inputs 204 and aslurry input 206. The column 202 may include a generally cylindricalupper portion 208 and a plurality of cylindrical stages 210 (e.g., 210a, 210 b, 210 c, 210 d, etc.), forming a lower portion 211 having agenerally conical interior. The elutriator 200 may be configured suchthat the higher-density particles settle to the bottom of the column202, and the lower-density particles rise to the top of the column 202.For example, water may enter the column 202 via the fluid inputs 204 inthe plurality of cylindrical stages 210. The water may be directedupward in the column 202 as the water leaves each cylindrical stage 210,such that water entering the column 202 from each fluid input 204 flowsparallel to water entering from adjacent fluid inputs 204. The water mayflow upward through the column 202 in a turbulent flow regime (e.g.,with a Reynolds number of at least about 2,300, at least about 10,000,at least about 50,000, or even at least about 100,000).

The column 202 may have a geometry selected to minimize or eliminate theboundary layer between the water and walls of the column 202. Forexample, the cylindrical stages 210 may each include a fluid input 204configured to deliver a portion of water. The fluid input 204 in thefirst stage 210 a may provide water flowing into a void defined by aninside wall 212 b of the second stage 210 b at a selected velocity. Thewater flowing into the column 202 through the first stage 210 a fillsthe entire void defined by an inside wall 212 b of the second stage 210b. The fluid input 204 in the second stage 210 b may provide water suchthat the water flows through a void defined by an inside wall 212 c ofthe third stage 210 c at the same selected velocity. The water flowinginto the column 202 through the second stage 210 b fills void defined byan inside wall 212 c of the third stage 210 c, which may besignificantly smaller than the void defined by the inside wall 212 b ofthe second stage 210 b. Thus, the flow through the second stage 210 bmay be significantly smaller than the flow through the first stage 210a. Thus, each fluid input 204 may provide water sufficient to maintain aconstant flow velocity from the bottom of the column 202 to the top ofthe column 202.

A top view of a single cylindrical stage 210 is shown in FIG. 10, and asection view through line A-A is shown in FIG. 11. The stage 210 shownis a cylindrical body and includes six fluid inputs 204 spaced aroundthe stage 210, but the stage 210 may be any shape and include any numberof fluid inputs 204. Fluid enters the stage 210 through the fluid inputs204, and passes through a channel 214. The channel 214 may be acylindrical void, open along an upper side of the stage 210. When thestage 210 is stacked in the column 202 (FIGS. 8 and 9), another stage210 may provide a boundary of the channel 214 to direct the flow towardthe inside wall 212. The fluid then flows through the channel 214 towardthe center of the stage 210, where a lip 216 deflects the fluid upward.The fluid then leaves the stage 210 and flows upward in the column 202.

The stages 210 may direct the fluid upward within an annular area (e.g.,the area between the lip 216 of the stage 210 and the inside wall 212 ofthe stage 210 above), and may continuously interrupt the boundary layersat the inside wall 212. Because the fluid from each stage 210 (startingwith second stage 210 b) is directed upward around flowing fluid fromlower stages 210, the volume near the lip 216 in which the fluid has alow-velocity fluid is relatively small. That is, the upward-flowingfluid in the center of the column 202 tends to carry fluid that wouldotherwise flow slowly (due to the no-slip boundary condition of fluidmechanics) at the lip 216. As the combined fluid flows upward, the fluidentering through the stage 210 may tend to mix with the fluid from lowerstages 210. The velocity profile of the combined fluid may tend toflatten, forming a more uniform flow as the fluid rises. In embodimentsin which the flow velocity increases slightly from the bottom of thecolumn 202 to the top of the column 202, the velocity may be slightlyhigher near the walls of the column 202 than at the center. Such avelocity profile may tend to cause heavier particles (e.g., particleshaving a terminal velocity higher than the average velocity of thefluid) to fall downward and toward the center of the column 202, whilelighter particles rise to the top of the column 202.

Particles of material to be separated may enter the elutriator 200 nearthe top of the column 202 via the slurry input 206. Though illustratedas a single flow into the center of the column 202, the slurry input 206may include one or more nozzles, a distribution manifold, a spray, orany other means to disperse particles within the column 202. Particlesof material in the slurry may be separated based on gravitational forcesand forces of the water. Thus, particle mass, particle surface area, andfluid flow conditions may each affect the speed and direction of travelof a particular particle. In particular, a particle on which thegravitational force exceeds the force of the water will fall in thecolumn 202, and a particle on which the force of the water exceeds thegravitational force will rise in the column 202.

The movement of particles in the column 202 may be characterized as aflow of particles in an upward-flowing stream of water. In such acharacterization, calculation of the terminal velocities of particles isinstructive, and may aid in the design or selection of the elutriator200. FIG. 12 shows calculated terminal velocities for particles ofvarious geometry and density. FIG. 12 includes terminal velocities basedon four particle shapes (sphere, cube, tetrahedron, and disk) and threedensities (ρ=2.5 g/cm³, ρ=6.5 g/cm³, and ρ=10.95 g/cm³). As shown inFIG. 12, the terminal velocities of smaller particles are influencedless by the particles' shapes than the terminal velocities of largerparticles. Thus, terminal velocities of smaller particles of a selecteddensity are more closely clustered than terminal velocities of largerparticles of the same density. This makes classification of smallerparticles by their densities relatively more effective thanclassification of larger particles. For example, in a sample ofparticles having an effective diameter of approximately 0.002 in. (0.051mm), an upward water flow at a velocity of between about 0.009 and 0.02ft/s (between about 0.0027 and 0.0060 m/s) would effectively separateparticles (whether spherical, cubic, tetrahedral, or disk-shaped) havinga density of 2.5 g/cm³ from particles having a density of 6.5 g/cm³. Asused herein, the term “effective diameter” of a particle means thediameter of a hypothetical spherical particle having the same mass asthe particle. In a sample of particles having an effective diameter ofapproximately 0.010 in. (0.25 mm), a water flow rate of between about0.13 and 0.16 ft/s (between about 0.040 and 0.049 m/s) would effectivelyseparate particles (whether spherical, cubic, tetrahedral, ordisk-shaped) having a density of 2.5 g/cm³ from particles having adensity of 6.5 g/cm³. For particles having an effective diameter largerthan about 0.015 in. (0.38 mm), separation of particles having a densityof 2.5 g/cm³ from particles having a density of 6.5 g/cm³ may not bepossible if one or both materials include particles of differinggeometry. That is, the terminal velocity curve for disk-shaped particleshaving a density of 6.5 g/cm³ crosses the terminal velocity curve forspherical particles having a density of 2.5 g/cm³ at a particle diameterof about 0.015 in. (0.38 mm).

Particles (e.g., lower-density particles) that flow upward in the column202 may eventually reach an upper outlet 218 (FIGS. 8 and 9), whereparticles may be collected and removed from the elutriator 200 with thefluid. Particles (e.g., higher-density particles) that flow downward inthe column 202 may eventually reach a lower outlet 220 (FIG. 9), whereparticles may be collected and removed.

The elutriator 200 may include multiple columns 202 selected andconfigured to separate different materials. For example, the particlescollected from the upper outlet 218 or the lower outlet 220 of thecolumn 202 may be transferred to another column 202 having differentdimensions or flow rates for subsequent separation. In some embodiments,the column 202 of the elutriator 200 may include additional outlets forwithdrawing materials.

The flow of materials into and out of the elutriator 200 may be measuredand/or controlled by flow meters, valves, a computer control system,etc. (e.g., the computer 184 shown in FIG. 3).

Referring again to FIG. 7, in embodiments in which the mixedheterogeneous material 106 (FIG. 3) contains uranium ore, thegravimetric separator 144 may be used to separate light fines 152 fromheavy fines 154. The light fines 152 may include barren material andcarbonaceous materials, and the heavy fines 154 may includeuranium-bearing minerals, such as uraninite. Processing of uranium orein the system 100 (FIG. 3) including in the separation system 140 mayproduce a concentration of less than about 1.0 parts per million (ppm)of uranium in waste fractions (e.g., light fines 152, grains 150, andoversize materials). The system 100 may be used to process uranium leftbehind in ore previously processed by ISR techniques.

Though described herein as having a screen 142 followed by a gravimetricseparator 144, other separation equipment and techniques may be used toseparate portions of the mixed heterogeneous material 106. For example,in some embodiments, the screen 142 or the gravimetric separator 144 maybe used alone. In other embodiments, the gravimetric separator 144 mayprecede the screen 142 in the process. Furthermore, the gravimetricseparator 144 may include any other equipment for classifying materialsbased on specific gravity, such as a centrifuge, a shaking table, aspiral separator, etc., instead of or in addition to the vertical column146.

As shown in FIG. 13, the system 100 for processing a heterogeneousmaterial may be disposed within a single container. For example, thesystem 100 may be contained substantially within a frame 180 on a skidor pallet 182 configured to be carried by a forklift and/or a commercialtruck, such that the system 100 may be transported and operated withoutdisassembly. In other words, the components of the system 100 may beentirely disposed within the frame 180, with the exception of portionsof piping, wiring, covers, etc. The frame 180 may surround and protectthe system 100 during transport, but may be open such that the system100 may be operated without removing the system 100 from the frame 180.Thus, onsite setup requirements and the costs associated with moving thesystem 100 may be minimized. The system 100 may include equipment asdiscussed above and shown schematically in FIGS. 3 and 7, such as a tank102, a pump 104, a nozzle assembly 114, a gravimetric separator 144,etc. Furthermore, the system 100 may include a computer 184 configuredto monitor and/or control operation of the system 100. In someembodiments, the frame 180 may have a length of from about 2 feet (0.61m) to about 10 feet (3.0 m), a width of from about 2 feet (0.61 m) toabout 8 feet (2.4 m), and a height of about 2 feet (0.61 m) to about 8feet (2.4 m). The system 100 may have a weight of, for example, fromabout 100 lbs (45.4 kg) to about 4,000 lbs (1814 kg). In someembodiments, the system 100 may be installed in a temporary or permanentfacility. In other embodiments, the system 100 may include unitizedcomponents configured to be transported by multiple commercial vehicles.For example, the system 100 may be transported on five 30-foot trailers.

The system 100 may also include one or more analytical instruments (notshown). For example, the system 100 may include instruments configuredto test X-ray fluorescence, gamma radiation (e.g., to determine theconcentrations of various isotopes of a material), turbidity, pH,bicarbonate ion concentration, particle size distribution (e.g., bylaser particle analysis) etc. The analytical instruments may becontrolled by the computer 184. The computer 184 may use data from theanalytical instruments to calculate a mass balance in real time. Thecomputed mass balance may be used in the control mechanism of the system100, quality control, maintenance, accounting, etc. For example, thecomputer 184 may track the amount of material processed in the system100 or the amount of a selected material produced. Thus, an operator ofthe system 100 may make informed decisions regarding maintenanceintervals, payment of usage fees, etc.

In some embodiments, the system 100 may be configured to optionally beused in conjunction with other systems 100. For example, a material(e.g., ore from a mining operation) may be processed in a first ablationsystem. After ablation in the first ablation system, ablated materialmay optionally be processed in a second ablation system. In someembodiments, the ablated material leaving the first ablation system maybe tested to determine whether subsequent processing is necessary ordesirable. The material may be processed through as many ablationsystems as necessary to achieve desired material properties. The flow ofmaterial through ablation systems may be varied during operations. Forexample, during a mining operation, material properties may vary widelywithin a formation. Some materials may be profitably processed through asingle ablation system, whereas other materials may be profitablyprocessed through two or more ablation systems in series. The flow ofmaterials through various ablation systems may be varied during miningoperations in response to changes in materials to be processed.

In some embodiments, and as shown in FIG. 14, system 200 may include apressurized fluid source 107. The pressurized fluid source 107 may becompressed air from a pump 104, or may be water, oil, or any otherfluid. The pressurized fluid source 107 may pass through a conduit to anozzle assembly (e.g., any of nozzle assemblies 114, 114′, 114″, asdescribed previously herein and shown in FIGS. 4 through 6), optionallypassing through a splitter 110. The fluid of the pressurized fluidsource 107 may entrain a heterogeneous material 103, such as from ahopper 101. An ablated heterogeneous material 124 may pass optionallyinto a tank 102 (e.g., a collection bin, a hopper, etc.) and then to aseparation system 140. A transport apparatus (e.g., a conveyor belt, achute, etc.) may carry the ablated heterogeneous material 124 to theseparation system 140. The system 200 may include a computer 184 forcontrol, data collection, etc.

Heterogeneous materials may be processed with the system 100, 200described herein. In some embodiments, heterogeneous material is crushedand/or screened to remove particles larger than a selected size, such asparticles that are too large to be effectively processed in the system100, 200. For example, in some embodiments, particles larger than about0.25 in. (larger than about 6.35 mm) may be removed. In manysandstone-hosted uranium ores, from about 5% to about 30% or more of thematerial forms particles larger than about 0.25 in. (larger than about6.35 mm) upon crushing. In such materials, particles of ore larger thanabout 0.25 in. that have been mechanically crushed may contain nouranium compounds. Therefore, these particles need not be processed bythe ablating process described herein if the goal is uranium recovery.These particles may instead be discarded as barren waste, used toreclaim mines, etc.

In other embodiments, no screening is necessary. For example, someheterogeneous solid feedstocks may already be entirely within sizerequirements of the system. For example, in the processing ofoil-contaminated sand or silicate-coated gold, grains of material mayall be within a range of sizes that may pass through the system.

Methods may include mixing the heterogeneous material with a liquid toform a slurry. For example, the slurry may be formed in a tank 102, asshown in FIG. 3. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous material may bemixed with the liquid before adding the heterogeneous material to thesystem. For example, in embodiments in which the heterogeneous materialis ore from an underground formation, the ore may be extracted byborehole mining. In borehole mining, the ore is extracted from theformation by high-pressure water jets, and is carried to the earth'ssurface by the water. The mixing of the heterogeneous solid ore with theliquid water therefore occurs in the underground formation. The slurrymay have any ratio of solids-to-liquids as long as the flow cantransport the solids to an impact zone. In some embodiments, the slurrymay include from about 5% to about 50% solids by mass, such as betweenabout 10% and about 20% solids by mass.

Methods may further include pumping streams of the slurry through anozzle assembly (e.g., any of nozzle assemblies 114, 114′, 114″, asdescribed previously herein and shown in FIGS. 4 through 6) andimpacting the streams (and therefore the particles therein) to ablateparticles of the slurry against one another. The streams may, in theprocess, recombine into a single slurry stream. The heterogeneousmaterial may separate into discrete fractions in the ablation process.For example, coatings may be removed from particles of the heterogeneousmaterial in the ablation process. In some embodiments, all or a portionof the slurry may be recycled through the system (e.g., returned to thetank 102).

The slurry that has been processed through the nozzle assembly may beprocessed to separate particles by size. For example, the slurry may bepassed through a screen to separate particles larger than a mesh size ofthe screen from particles smaller than the mesh size of the screen. Forexample, the particles of the slurry may be separated into grains largerthan 0.004 in. (0.10 mm) and fines smaller than 0.004 in. (0.10 mm) byappropriately selecting the mesh size of the screen. In someembodiments, multiple separations may be performed, such as by passingportions of the slurry through multiple screens in series. Differentsize classifications may be selected by selecting one or moreappropriate screens.

Particles having approximately the same size (such that separation bysize classification may be difficult or expensive) may have differentcompositions, and separation of particles with different compositionsmay be desirable. For example, uranium-rich fines may have similar sizesas non-bearing or uranium-depleted fines formed from ablation ofmaterial from a single formation. Light and heavy fines may requiredifferent techniques to recover uranium. Therefore, to reduce the amountof material that must be processed by other means (e.g., chemically) toextract the uranium, the fines may be separated gravimetrically. Forexample, the fines may be disposed in a vertical column of water, and afluid may flow upward through the column, such as at turbulent flowrates. The fluid may be water, mineral oil, an organic solvent, air,etc. Water may be selected based on its flow properties, availability,and minimal environmental impact, but other fluids may be used instead.The fines may be separated in the column by their densities, withheavier fines dropping to the bottom, and lighter fines rising to thetop. Gravimetric separation may be performed in one or more stages, withdifferent stages having different densities at which the separationoccurs. Various parameters may affect the separation, such as the typeof fluid used, the temperature, the flow rates, the size of the column,etc.

Fluids used in the process, such as in the slurry or in the gravimetricseparation, may be removed from the solids in a dewatering operation.Fluids may be processed by filtration, ion exchange, reverse osmosis,etc., to remove residual impurities, enabling recycling of the fluids.

The ablation process described herein may be coupled with boreholemining, the borehole mine providing the heterogeneous material 103 to beprocessed. In some embodiments, the heterogeneous material 103 is anore, such as a uranium-bearing ore. The use of borehole mining inconjunction with an ablation system as described herein may provideoperational, environmental, and other advantages. For example, boreholemining may be used to extract minerals from unbounded deposits, depositslocated above the water table, shallow deposits with insufficienthydrologic permeability, deposits in impermeable rock formations, orsmall deposits of minerals that may not be economically, technically, orlawfully recoverable by conventional ISR. Borehole mining may beperformed in independent wells that do not have to be connected to otherwells in the field. A single well may be used to penetrate a formation,scour the ore from the formation, carry the scoured ore to the surfaceby a slurry, and return barren fractions of processed ore to theformation. This may allow extraction of minerals with a reduced surfacefootprint in comparison to conventional methods.

Borehole mining is a technique for extracting mineral deposits from anunderground formation. Typically, a borehole is drilled to a desireddepth. A casing may be inserted into a portion of the borehole. Aborehole mining tool is inserted into the borehole, and water is pumpedinto the tool to produce high-pressure water jets. The jets scour orefrom the formation, and the mined ore is carried to the surface in aslurry of the water. Though borehole mining has been demonstrated as amethod of mining underground deposits, the method generally requires anearby mill, and may require further separation of ore after transportto the surface.

Borehole mining, a water-only approach, may enable the removal ofminerals that may conventionally (e.g., via ISR) be removed by injectinga leachate or lixiviant into a formation, but without problemsassociated with the use of leachates or lixiviants. In borehole mining,water jets may physically remove formation material without chemicallymobilizing or dissolving metals, limiting the risk of aquifercontamination. Water jets may operate without modifying foiniationchemistry and without additional reagent costs. Borehole mining may alsobe simpler than conventional ISR. Because material of the formation isextracted, rather than processed in-situ, borehole mining may begin withless information known about the formation. Though the boundaries of theformation and geological characteristic may still need to be probed,geochemical classification and permeability of the formation are notnecessary to perform a borehole mining operation because borehole miningdoes not rely on chemical reaction or on permeation.

In some embodiments, borehole mining may be used to scour ore from awedge-shaped volume of an underground formation. The extent of thevolume may be tailored by controlling the direction, location, andintensity of the water jets. Borehole mining may therefore be used toasymmetrically excavate the formation, roughly following foiinationboundaries. The ore from the wedge-shaped volume may be extracted andprocessed. The wedge may then be refilled, such as with barren waste orfill and, optionally, a cementing material. Additional volumes ofmaterial may be extracted in a similar manner. Additional volumes may beexcavated from a well in which volumes have previously been excavatedand refilled. The refilled volumes may provide structural support forlater-excavated volumes. Reinjection of the barren waste may reducesurface disturbance and reclamation requirements. When used inconjunction with borehole mining, the systems described herein mayinclude a surge tank to regulate the flow of material to the systems.

The ablation process described herein may also be used to processfeedstocks from other types of mining operations, such as open-pitmining or underground mining. In such operations, ore may be minedconventionally and processed by ablation, for example, near the mine.The barren waste may be returned to the mine, leaving a small bearingfraction. The bearing fraction may be transported elsewhere for furtherprocessing. By separating the ore by ablation near the mine,transportation costs may be greatly reduced.

In some embodiments, the ablation process described herein may be usedto process material having a concentration of mineral components too lowfor economic recovery by conventional processes. For example, waste oroverburden from other mining operations may be processed using ablation.Furthermore, materials may be treated by ablation to aid inenvironmental remediation, such as by lowering the concentration ofchemical species in material previously mined. For example, the ablationprocess may be used for remediation of contaminated land near mines nolonger operating. In such embodiments, the goal may be clean-up of asite. The chemical species recovered may be disposed of (the masscontaining the chemical species being much smaller than the total massinitially contaminated), sold, or further processed.

The system and method disclosed herein may be scaled as dictated byconstraints of a particular application (e.g., cost, portability,operating footprint, etc.). For example, the system 100, 200 may have acapacity of from about 750 to about 1,000 lbs per hour (about 340 toabout 454 kilograms per hour), and may fit within the frame 180, asshown in FIG. 13. Other systems 100, 200 may have a capacity of about40,000 lbs per hour (about 20 tons per hour or 18,100 kilograms perhour) or more. The capacity of the system 100, 200 may be varied byvarying the capacity of individual components, as known in the art. Thecapacity of the nozzle assembly 114 may be varied by varying the sizeand/or number of nozzles 116 or the particle size distribution of themixed heterogeneous material 106 entering the system 100, 200.

The systems and methods disclosed herein may be used to quickly separateportions of materials using water, without the addition of chemicalreactants. Water may provide energy to physically dissociate theportions into discrete particles that may be separated based on particlesize and density. In materials having coatings or patinas, the methodsmay significantly reduce the amount of material to be further processedto recover various components.

For example, in the processing of typical sandstone-hosted uranium ores,95% or more of the uranium-containing compounds may be concentrated into10% of the mass, with the remaining 90% of the mass containing onlyabout 5% or less of the uranium-containing compounds. For example, themajority of the uranium may be in particles that pass through a 325-meshor 400-mesh screen (i.e., particles smaller than about 0.0017 in. (0.044mm) or 0.0015 in. (0.037 mm) diameter). In ores having relatively lowerinitial concentrations of uranium, the separation may be relatively lesseffective.

Slurry pumps (e.g., slurry pump 104) conventionally have an upper limiton the size of particles that can be processed in a slurry. Removal ofparticles larger than a selected size (e.g., larger than about 0.25 in.(6.35 mm)) may enable the use of a smaller pump 104 than would otherwisebe utilized if these larger particles were present. However, in theprocessing of uranium ores, removal of such larger particles does notsignificantly affect uranium recovery because this ore fraction containsvirtually no uranium.

The following examples serve to explain embodiments of the presentdisclosure in more detail. These examples are not to be construed asbeing exhaustive or exclusive as to the scope of this presentdisclosure.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Silicate-Plated Gold Processing

Precious metal ores were extracted from hydrothermal deposits byconventional mining techniques. The ores contained micro-fine goldparticles having silicate patinas. The silicate patinas interfered withgravity separation of the gold-bearing particles from barren material.The silicate chemistry made the patinas difficult to remove chemically.The ore was crushed, mixed with water to form a slurry, and passedthrough a pair of opposing nozzles, each having an exit diameter of 0.5in. (12.7 mm), directed to an impact zone 118, as in the nozzle assembly114 shown in FIG. 4, at a flow rate of 100 gpm (6.3 l/s) and a pressureof 32 psi (221 kPa). The collision of the opposing slurry streamsimparted enough energy to the gold particles to remove the silicapatinas after each particle had passed through the nozzle assembly 114an average of 40 times. The process was performed in batch mode, suchthat an entire batch of ore was continuously recycled through the nozzleassembly 114 until the patinas were removed from the gold particles.With the patinas removed, the gold was recovered by conventional gravityseparation.

Example 2 Oil-Contaminated Sand Processing

A sample of oil-contaminated sand was prepared by mixing a volume ofsand with crude oil. The oil-contaminated sand was mixed with water anda bio-degradable wood product (available from LBI Renewable, of Buffalo,Wyo., under the trade name DUALZORB®) to form a slurry, and the slurrywas passed through a pair of nozzles, each having an exit diameter of0.5 in. (12.7 mm), directed to an impact zone 118, as in the nozzleassembly 114 shown in FIG. 4, at a flow rate of 40 gpm (2.52 l/s) and apressure of 32 psi (221 kPa). The collision of the opposing slurrystreams imparted enough energy to the sand to remove the crude oilcoating from the sand after each particle of sand had passed through thenozzle assembly 114 an average of two times. Upon removal of the oilcoating from the sand, the wood product absorbed the oil. The processwas performed in batch mode, such that an entire batch of sand wasrecycled through the nozzle assembly 114 until the oil was removed fromthe sand. The cleaned sand was separated from the oil-soaked woodproduct and water.

The process may alternatively be performed with a surfactant (e.g., aliquid surfactant) instead of or in addition to the bio-degradable woodproduct. The surfactant may promote the mixture of oil with the water.The surfactant or the wood product may prevent the oil from re-coatingthe sand after the sand leaves the impact zone 118.

Example 3 Uranium Ore Processing

Uranium ores were mechanically extracted from a sandstone formation. Theores contained oversize materials that contained only minimal amounts ofuranium. A patina of deposited fine uranium minerals coatednon-uranium-bearing grains. The ores also contained fine deposits ofnon-uranium-bearing minerals. The ore was crushed and screened to removethe oversize materials larger than about 0.25 in. (6.35 mm). The grainsand fines were processed in the system 100 shown in FIG. 3. The grainsand fines were mixed with water to form a slurry having about 20% solidsby weight. The slurry was pumped through a pipe having vanes to increaseuniformity of the slurry, split into two streams, and passed through apair of nozzles, each having an exit diameter of 0.5 in. (12.7 mm)directed toward an impact zone at a flow rate of 30 gpm (1.89 l/s) and apressure of 32 psi (221 kPa). The nozzle diameter may be any appropriatesize, such as 0.375 in. (9.53 mm). The collision of the opposing slurrystreams imparted enough energy to the ore particles to physically removethe fines from the grains after each particle had passed through thenozzle assembly 114 an average of 15 times. With the fines removed,grains were separated from fines by screening. The fines were classifiedby density in a vertical column, producing a uranium-rich heavy (i.e.,dense) fraction and a barren light fraction. The heavy fines were asmall portion of the run-of-mine ore and were determined to be suitablefor further refining (e.g., by conventional chemical means). The lightfines, grains, and oversize materials were analyzed and it wasdetermined that the concentration of uranium was low enough that thematerials were suitable for use as backfill. Water used in the ablationprocess was found to contain dissolved uranium and radium. Theseelements were recovered from the water via ion exchange and reverseosmosis.

Comparative Example 4 Particle-Size Distribution of Crushed Ore andUranium Distribution as a Function of Particle Size

A sample of uranium-bearing sandstone was mechanically crushed justenough to break joints between grains, leaving the underlying grainstructure intact. The crushed ore was segregated by screening to removeparticles larger than 0.25 in. (6.35 mm). The sample included a mixtureof ores from multiple sandstone-hosted uranium deposits located in thewestern United States. However, despite being from different deposits,each ore exhibited common characteristics, including an identifiablegrain structure of quartz and feldspars, similar pre-ablation sizedistributions, and the presence of carbonaceous materials up to 25.4 mm(1 in.) in size.

Like ores from many sandstone-hosted deposits, the ores tested hadclearly identifiable grains ranging in size from less than 1 mm to morethan 10 mm. As shown in FIG. 15, one portion of an ore sample ischaracterized by relatively large grains. As shown in FIG. 16, taken atthe same magnification, another portion of the same ore has a relativelyfiner grain structure. A range of grain sizes within ore from a singledeposit is typical of ore from sandstone-hosted deposits. The presenceof carbonaceous materials with high post-depositional elementconcentrations, including uranium, is also typical of sandstone-hosteduranium ores. Carbonaceous material fragments are visible in FIG. 16 asblack material. From the same ore, FIG. 17 shows carbonaceous materialembedded in the patina surrounding a grain.

Of the crushed ore that passed through a 0.25-in. (6.35-mm) screen,about 75% of the mass is in particles larger than 60-mesh (about 0.0098in. (0.25 mm)), with decreasing percentages present in successivelysmaller size fractions. The average particle-size distribution of theparticles smaller than about 0.25 in. (6.35 mm) is shown in FIG. 18 forthe ores tested, including range bars showing the variation between thesamples analyzed.

The separated particles were tested for uranium content by X-rayfluorescence (XRF). FIG. 19 shows the percentage of uranium in each sizefraction smaller than 0.25 in. (6.35 mm). In general, the uranium massdistribution corresponds to the total mass distribution. FIG. 19suggests that, in some sandstone-hosted uranium deposits, removal of aminus 0.25-in. size fraction by screening also removes a correspondingpercentage of the uranium in the deposit. Further, removal of anyfraction other than the plus 60-mesh size fraction would result in onlya marginal reduction in the amount of ore remaining to be furtherprocessed.

Example 5 Particle-Size Distribution of Ablated Crushed Ore and UraniumDistribution as a Function of Particle Size

A sample of uranium-bearing sandstone was mechanically crushed forprocessing by ablation. The crushed sandstone was mixed with water toform a slurry, and passed through a pair of opposing nozzles, eachhaving an exit diameter of 0.5 in. (12.7 mm), directed to an impactzone, as in the nozzle assembly 114 shown in FIG. 4, at a flow rate of30 gpm (1.89 l/s) and a pressure of 32 psi (221 kPa). The collision ofthe opposing slurry streams imparted enough energy to the sandstoneparticles to remove the patinas and carbonaceous materials after eachparticle had passed through the nozzle assembly 114 an average of 40times. The process was performed in batch mode, such that an entirebatch of ore was continuously recycled through the nozzle assembly 114until the patinas were removed from the grains. The fines were separatedinto light fines and heavy fines by elutriation, such as by anelutriator 200 (see FIGS. 8 and 9).

A sample of the light fines was tested for elemental concentrations byXRF. A sample of the sandstone from which the particles were extracted(i.e., a sample that was not processed by ablation) was also tested byXRF. Table 1 lists the concentration of various elements inparts-per-million (ppm) in the light fines and in the sandstone. Carbonis not present in this analysis because the XRF analysis does notmeasure carbon.

TABLE 1 Concentration of elements in samples tested in Example 5Concentration Concentration Element in light fines (ppm) in Sandstone(ppm) As 25 6.1 Ba 1,468 341 Bi 307 ND Ca >100,000 2,886 Cl 1,891 ND Cr30 14 Cu 67 ND Fe 11,800 5,974 Hg 12 ND K 28,200 28,500 Mn 664 39 S21,300 9,270 Sb 1,181 ND Sr 779 63.8 Ti 1402 840 U 59,300 683 V 411 40Zn 53 10.3 Zr 105 101 ND = not detected

Example 6 Concentration of Uranium in Heavy Fines as a Function ofParticle Size

A sample of heavy fines was tested from the uranium-bearing sandstoneprocessed by ablation in Example 5. The sample of heavy fines wasscreened through successively finer screens to 600-mesh. Afterscreening, the uranium concentration in each fraction was measured. Theuranium concentration increased as the particle diameter decreased,never reaching an inflection point. This suggests that ablation of thesandstone forms uranium-containing fines small enough to pass through a600-mesh screen.

Example 7 Concentration of Uranium in Slurry

Slurry was tested from the sample of uranium-bearing sandstone processedby ablation in Example 5. The slurry (including heavy fines and lightfines) was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 50 minutes. The supernatant(liquid) was tested by inductively coupled plasma optical emissionspectroscopy (ICP-OES) with a spectrometer available from SpectroAnalytical Instruments GmbH, or Kleve, Germany, under the trade nameCIROS® VISION, and determined to have a uranium concentration of 16 ppm.This supernatant was then filtered through a 0.45-μm filter. Thefiltered supernatant was tested by ICP-OES, and the uraniumconcentration was below the lower detection limit (approximately 1 ppm)of the ICP-OES spectrometer. The removal of uranium by a 0.45-μm filtersuggests that the uranium present in the solution after centrifuging wasprimarily colloidal or near-colloidal in size, rather than dissolved.

In Examples 5 through 7, ablation appears to dissociate carbonaceousmaterials from the patinas and cementing minerals, before breaking thecarbonaceous materials down into smaller fragments as light fines.However, because some carbonaceous materials are bonded togetherindependent of coatings of grains of larger materials, some carbonaceousmaterials tend to remain as particles larger than minus 400-meshparticles (i.e., particles that pass through a 400-mesh screen). Themineralized patina, which appears to have relatively weaker bondsbetween particles of the patina, forms relatively smaller particles.After ablation, fragments of the carbonaceous material remain withineach size fraction separated by the screens.

The characteristics of each uranium-bearing fraction of the ore—thepulverized mineral patina and the carbonaceous material—make both easilyseparable from the uranium-barren materials after ablation. Because theablated uranium mineral patina is very fine, it can be separated fromthe barren fractions by simply screening and capturing all the materialssmaller than a selected size. In contrast, fragments of the carbonaceousmaterials are present in each size fraction after ablation. However,because the carbonaceous materials have relatively low specificgravities, they can be separated from barren materials in eachpost-ablation size fraction by elutriation. Because the carbonaceousmaterials have specific gravities only slightly higher than that ofwater, elutriation can efficiently separate these particles from thebarren grains and cementing minerals. Thus, after removal of the fineparticles by screening and removal of the light particles byelutriation, the remaining material may include virtually no uranium,enabling an almost complete recovery of the uranium from the ore byfurther processing (e.g., by chemical means) of only the fines and thelight particles.

Example 8 Uranium Content of Size Fractions Before and after Ablation

A sample of uranium-bearing sandstone was mechanically crushed, asdescribed in Example 4. The ore was screened to remove materials largerthan 0.25-in. (6.35 mm). After screening, the ore was weighed todetermine the volume of culinary water necessary to perform ablation.For sandstone-hosted uranium ores, the ablation system operates at peakefficiency with slurry densities of between about 10% and about 20%(i.e., when the slurry contains from about 10% to 20% solids by mass).With the appropriate volume of water added to the ablation system, theslurry pump circulated water through a mixing device, a splitter,nozzles, and a tank. The ore sample was then added to a hopper feedingthe tank, and the resulting slurry was circulated through the ablationsystem at a flow rate of 30 gpm (1.89 l/s) and a pressure of 32 psi (221kPa). The ablation system included a pair of opposing nozzles, eachhaving an exit diameter of 0.5 in. (12.7 mm).

Samples of the slurry were collected after 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50minutes. At each time interval, a small amount of the slurry wasdischarged into a clean 5-gallon bucket. Each sample was screenedthrough a 60-mesh stainless steel GILSON® screen and the capturedmaterial (the plus 60-mesh fraction) was tested by XRF to determine itsuranium concentration. The uranium concentration in the plus 60-meshsample was compared to the uranium concentration in a pre-ablation plus60-mesh sample to determine at what point ablation had effectivelyremoved the mineralized patina from the grains. Ideally, an ablationtime may be determined during which the mineralized patina is removed,but the grains themselves do not break down, maximizing the volume ofbarren grains that can be separated from the pulverized uranium bearingpatina by screening.

For these samples, a comparison of the uranium concentrations in thepre- and post-ablation plus 60 fractions suggested that, after 5minutes, ablation had effectively removed the mineralized patina.Various factors may affect ablation time, including the thickness of thepatina, the mass distribution of the pre-ablated material, and the shapeof the underlying grain.

The material removed from the ablation system after 5 minutes was passedthrough a series of GILSON® screens ranging from 60-mesh to 325-mesh.The sample captured on each screen was dried, weighed, and analyzed byXRF to determine both the mass and uranium balance of each sample. FIG.20 shows the percentage of total mass and percentage of uranium mass ineach size fraction smaller than 0.25 in. (6.35 mm), for both the ablatedsample (after five minutes) and an unablated sample. In addition, theclarified post-ablation water was analyzed to determine how much uraniumdissolved in the water during ablation.

The difference between the unablated sample and the ablated sampleillustrates how ore from sandstone-hosted uranium deposits behavesduring ablation. When effectively ablated, the mass of particles ofsandstone-hosted uranium ores showed a minor shift from larger tosmaller size fractions, whereas the uranium was almost completelyconcentrated into the minus 325-mesh fraction (see FIG. 20).

Prior to ablation, the plus 60-mesh fraction contained about 74% of thetotal mass and 46% of the uranium. After ablation, this fractioncontained about 73% of the total mass but only 1.8% of the uranium.Before ablation, the minus 325-mesh fraction contained about 3% of thetotal mass and 10.4% of the uranium. After ablation, this fractioncontained about 7% of the total mass and 94.9% of the uranium. It isbelieved that the increase in mass in the fines and the almost completetransfer of uranium into the minus 325-mesh fraction both occur because,during ablation, the mineralized patina around the grain is removed andpulverized into particles smaller than 325-mesh. The residual uranium inthe plus 325-mesh fractions appears to be in fragments of carbonaceousmaterial.

Samples of the clarified ablation water collected at 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 and50 minutes were analyzed using XRF. FIGS. 21 and 22 collectively showthe concentrations of the seven elements detected consistently in theablation water (As, Cl, K, Rb, S, Sr, and U) as a function of ablationtime. The uranium concentration in the ablation solution was 22 ppmafter one minute of ablation, which represents 27.9% of the uranium inthe head ore. The uranium concentration increased to 25 ppm after fiveminutes of ablation.

The tests performed on sandstone-hosted uranium ores show that, withinfive minutes, the ablation process concentrates almost all of thenon-solubilized uranium into a very small fraction of the original ore.An average of 95% of the non-solubilized uranium was present in theminus 325-mesh material, which accounted for between 5% and 7% of themass of the ablated ore. Therefore, after 5 minutes of ablation, if allmaterials larger than 325-mesh were removed from the post ablationslurry stream, and only the minus 325-mesh post ablated material weresubsequently processed, a 95% recovery of the uranium would be possible.Furthermore, subsequent processing could be reduced by between 93% and95% (corresponding to the 93%-95% of material that need not be furtherprocessed). Higher mass reductions and recovery rates can be achieved byelutriating and capturing the light carbonaceous materials that remainin each fraction after ablation. However, even without elutriation, theablation-only recovery rates compare favorably to conventional miningmethods because, although 95% is roughly equivalent to the recoveryachieved by leaching, ablation accomplishes this recovery in fiveminutes, using only culinary water, and does so while reducing by 90% ormore the volume of ore that needs to be processed to recover theuranium.

Another way to gauge the effectiveness of ablation on sandstone-hostedores is to visually compare unablated and ablated samples of the sameore. The pre-ablated sample of Example 8 had clearly identifiablegrains, but, because of the adhered mineral patina, the underlying grainitself was hidden from view (see FIG. 23). The patina-coated grains hada grayish appearance. In addition, identifiable fragments of thecarbonaceous materials were visible, often embedded or partially coatedin the mineralized patina. In comparison, the ablated grains wereclearly identifiable and free of mineralized patina (see FIG. 24).Ablated fragments of carbonaceous materials were interspersed with thesegrains.

Example 9 Ablation with Deionized Water

A sample of uranium-bearing sandstone was mechanically crushed andablated, as described in Example 8. However, deionized water was used asthe liquid component of the slurry. The ablation slurry had a distinctsilvery appearance that never settled out of the ablation slurry duringcentrifugation. This supernatant was then filtered through a 0.45-μmfilter and analyzed using XRF. No uranium was detected in the filteredablation water. A portion of the supernatant that had not been filteredwas also analyzed using XRF, and found to contain uranium. This suggeststhat the ablation slurry, before filtering, contained micro-fine uraniummaterial. The micro-fine material appears to be small enough to remainin suspension, and may include other post-depositional elements thatwould be dissolved into untreated water (e.g., water having dissolvedcarbonates) if untreated water were used as the slurry fluid.

When sandstone-hosted uranium ores are ablated with untreated water(e.g., culinary water, ground water, etc.), some of the uranium maydissolve into the ablation fluid. The amount dissolved varies dependingon the deposit and the water used, but may range from one-tenth toone-third or more of the total uranium in the ore. Without being boundto a particular theory, it is believed that naturally occurringcarbonates in the untreated water solubilize some of the uranium fromthe ore during ablation.

While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications andalternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way ofexample in the drawings and have been described in detail herein.However, the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particularforms disclosed. Rather, the disclosure is to cover all modifications,equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosureas defined by the following appended claims and their legal equivalents.In addition, features from one embodiment may be combined with featuresof another embodiment while still being encompassed within the scope ofthe present disclosure as contemplated by the inventors. Further,embodiments of the present disclosure have utility in the processing ofvarious types of heterogeneous materials.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for processing a heterogeneous material,comprising: a conduit for a pressurized fluid; and a nozzle assembly influid communication with the conduit, the nozzle assembly comprising aplurality of adjustable nozzles configured such that streams comprisinga heterogeneous material passing through each of the plurality ofadjustable nozzles intersect after passing through the plurality ofadjustable nozzles.
 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a pumpconfigured to deliver the pressurized fluid and particles of theheterogeneous material to the nozzle assembly.
 3. The system of claim 2,further comprising a borehole mining assembly in fluid communicationwith the pump.
 4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a splitterconfigured to divide the heterogeneous material into a plurality ofstreams, each stream of the plurality in fluid communication with oneadjustable nozzle of the plurality.
 5. The system of claim 1, furthercomprising a gravity separation system configured to receive at least aportion of the plurality of streams of the heterogeneous material andseparate solid particles of the heterogeneous material according todensity of the solid particles.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein thegravity separation system comprises a vertical column configured tocontain water flowing upward in a turbulent regime.
 7. The system ofclaim 6, wherein the gravity separation system comprises a plurality ofinlets, each configured to direct water upward in the vertical column.8. The system of claim 1, wherein the nozzle assembly comprises twoadjustable nozzles opposingly oriented over a recovery tank.
 9. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the nozzle assembly comprises a firstcylindrical flow channel having a first cross-sectional area and asecond cylindrical flow channel having a second, smaller cross-sectionalarea, wherein the nozzle assembly is configured to pass theheterogeneous material through the first cylindrical flow channel beforepassing the heterogeneous material through the second cylindrical flowchannel.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the second, smallercross-sectional area is from about 5% to about 20% of the firstcross-sectional area.
 11. The system of claim 9, wherein the nozzleassembly comprises a third cylindrical flow channel having a thirdcross-sectional area, the third cross-sectional area smaller than thesecond, smaller cross-sectional area, wherein the nozzle assembly isconfigured to pass the heterogeneous material through the secondcylindrical flow channel before passing the heterogeneous materialthrough the third cylindrical flow channel.
 12. A system for processinga heterogeneous material, comprising: a conduit for a pressurized fluid;a nozzle assembly in fluid communication with the conduit, the nozzleassembly comprising an adjustable nozzle configured such that a streamof a heterogeneous material passing through the adjustable nozzlecontacts a surface approximately perpendicular to the surface afterpassing through the adjustable nozzle; and a separation systemconfigured to separate particles of the heterogeneous material into afirst fraction and a second fraction, the particles of the firstfraction having a first average property, and the particles of thesecond fraction having a second average property different from thefirst average property.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the firstaverage property and the second average property of the particles eachcomprise a property selected from the group consisting of density, size,electrostatic charge, shape, and magnetic character of the particles ofthe heterogeneous material.
 14. A method of processing a heterogeneousmaterial, comprising: entraining heterogeneous particles of a materialinto a fluid stream; passing the fluid stream through at least oneadjustable nozzle; impacting the fluid stream to ablate theheterogeneous particles of the material; and classifying theheterogeneous particles.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein entrainingheterogeneous particles into a fluid stream comprises mixing theheterogeneous particles with a fluid to form a slurry.
 16. The method ofclaim 14, wherein impacting the fluid stream to ablate the heterogeneousparticles comprises impacting a plurality of streams flowing in alaminar regime.
 17. The method of claim 14, further comprising crushinga heterogeneous material and removing particles having an averagediameter larger than a selected value from the heterogeneous materialbefore entraining the heterogeneous particles into the fluid stream. 18.The method of claim 14, wherein impacting the fluid stream to ablate theheterogeneous particles comprises impacting the fluid stream with atleast another fluid stream containing heterogeneous particles within anozzle assembly.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein impacting the fluidstream with at least another fluid stream comprises collidingheterogeneous particles entrained in the fluid stream with heterogeneousparticles entrained in the at least another fluid stream.
 20. The methodof claim 14, wherein impacting the fluid stream comprises collidingheterogeneous particles entrained in the fluid stream with a solidobject.
 21. The method of claim 14, wherein classifying theheterogeneous particles comprises classifying the heterogeneousparticles based on density.
 22. The method of claim 21, whereinclassifying the heterogeneous particles based on density comprisesseparating at least a portion of the heterogeneous particles in agravity-based separator.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein separatingat least a portion of the heterogeneous particles in a gravity-basedseparator comprises separating the at least a portion of theheterogeneous particles in a vertical column of water.
 24. The method ofclaim 14, wherein entraining heterogeneous particles into a fluid streamcomprises mixing uranium ore with water.
 25. The method of claim 14,wherein entraining heterogeneous particles into a fluid stream comprisesmixing oil-contaminated sand with water.
 26. The method of claim 14,wherein entraining heterogeneous particles into a fluid stream comprisesentraining the heterogeneous particles in water substantially free of areagent.